Drenched in Heat and Not Asking Nicely
By July, the clothes give up. The layers you negotiated with all spring get folded away, and what’s left is whatever you can actually stand against your skin at three in the afternoon. Heat is an honest editor. It strips the wardrobe down to the bare minimum of cloth and the bare maximum of body, and somewhere between the bus stop and the grocery line, you remember the old lesson: in summer, more of you is public.
And being public teaches you, again, that visibility is not a contract. Being seen is not the same as being available — to be touched, ranked, narrated, corrected, or consumed. The shoulder is bare because it’s ninety degrees, not because it’s asking a question. The distance between I can see you and you belong to me now is the whole subject of this month.
That distance gets shorter or longer depending on whose body is doing the standing there.
For some, summer’s exposure is a small thrill — a sundress, a tan line, an easy yes to the weather. For others, the same heat is a negotiation that never closes. Consider how most clothing is built: on the silent assumption that everyone stands, bends, and reaches without thinking about it. In a guide on dressing with mobility aids, writer Liana Wang lays out what that assumption costs — waistbands that press wrong against a seated body, fabric that bunches into pressure points over a long day, closures designed for hands that grip easily and arms that lift high. These aren’t rare exceptions. They’re the default experience of getting dressed in a world that cut its patterns for one imagined body and left everyone else to adapt or disappear. The garment is never really the point. The point is the assumption underneath it — that there is one shape worth designing for, and the rest can make do.
Disabled bodies get the cruelest version of the visibility dial. Either turned all the way down — no adaptive cut, no model who moves differently, no room made — or turned all the way up, flattened into inspiration, a thing to be moved by rather than a person picking an outfit for a Tuesday. Unseen or over-seen. Both are forms of being consumed. Neither one stops to ask.
This is where the summer body meets the cash register, and where Codetta has to be honest about the ground it stands on. The secondhand economy is not innocent simply because it isn’t fast fashion. In a sharp piece for the University of Illinois’s Q Magazine, Nikki Palella traces how thrifting flipped from a survival practice into a status symbol — a habit once looked down on, now worn like a credential — while the same industry quietly took from the very people it claimed to lift. Her most damning thread runs straight through this month’s themes: reporting has documented Goodwill, a charitable nonprofit, paying some disabled workers as little as 22 cents an hour, using a federal certificate that still permits subminimum wages for disabled employees. The brand stayed warm and visible — the feel-good donation, the green halo — and that visibility was built on labor kept out of sight.
Seen and consumed are different verbs, and the gap between them is exactly where exploitation makes its home. So “Visibility ≠ Consent” was never only about the gaze landing on a bare arm. It’s about who gets to be seen as a whole person, and who gets seen as a resource. A disabled worker sorting donations for pennies is hyper-useful and entirely unseen. A disabled body on a sidewalk in July is hyper-seen and rarely asked. The same machinery runs both, and it runs on the assumption that some people’s bodies are there to be used — for labor, for inspiration, for the comfort of feeling like a good Samaritan.
There’s a tempting way to end an essay like this: dress to deflect. Cover up, brace, become a closed door. But concealment-as-strategy is just the other side of the same coin — it still lets the looker set the terms. The body doesn’t owe anyone its hiding any more than it owes them its access. Boundary isn’t a wall you build; it’s a sentence you finish for yourself.
The real summer answer is smaller and harder than that. Dress for your own threshold. Bare what you want bared, cover what you want covered, and let the heat make you honest about what you can actually tolerate against your skin — and let that be the entire reason.
Not what reads well. Not what invites or deflects. What you can stand. The right to set your own exposure, day by day, is the quiet thing that disability justice, fat liberation, and plain bodily autonomy have all been saying in different rooms: my visibility is not your invitation.
Consent is the word the fashion industry keeps editing out of the sentence. Put it back in. To be visible and still belong to yourself. To be looked at and not handed over. To take up the sidewalk, sweat at the back of the neck, opinions intact, and owe the afternoon absolutely nothing.
The heat will perceive you either way. The only question worth answering is on whose terms.